Urban waste-water treatment plants as hotspots for birds : an environmental assessment highlights the role of a single dominant gull
Main Article Content
Abstract
Waste-water treatment plants (WWTPs) are still little explored in their ecological role. This work reports data obtained from standardized sampling for the two largest Italian WWTPs, to obtain seasonal patterns (late winter, spring, and autumn) of univariate diversity metrics in bird communities. The ecological conditions, linked above all to the high availability of water, with the presence of mud and trophic resources, and heterogeneous features (buildings, trees, and hedges), allow the presence of water-related and synanthropic bird species, using the site as a seasonal stopover and wintering sites. The large availability of biomass of invertebrates, linked to the sludge from the water-waste treatment plants, can provide an important trophic resource during spring migration. The richness, diversity and evenness did not differ significantly between the two plants analysed, both having comparable size and heterogeneity. The highest Simpson dominance values were recorded in autumn with species frequency concentrated in a few abundant species. Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) shows a close association between the autumn period and the dominant Black-headed Gull (Chroicocephalus ridibundus), in both treatment plants, with possible implication on the spreading on zoonosis.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licence CC-BY 4.0
References
Alves JA, Sutherland WJ, Gill JA 2012. Will improving wastewater treatment impact shorebirds? Effects of sewage discharges on estuarine invertebrates and birds. Anim Conserv 15(1): 44-52
Andersen DC, Sartoris JJ, Thullen JS, Reusch PG 2003. The effects of bird use on nutrient removal in a constructed wastewater-treatment wetland. Wetlands 23(2): 423-435
Arena S, Battisti C, Carpaneto GM 2011. The ecological importance of wetlands for aerial insectivores (swifts, martins and swallows) along the Tyrrhenian coast. Rendiconti Lincei 22: 395-402
Baccetti N, Fracasso G, Commissione Ornitologica Italiana 2021. CISO-COI Check-list of Italian bird–2020. Avocetta 45: 21-82
Battisti C, Fraticelli F 2023. When ‘bullies’ come out of cities: mobbing among introduced Rose-Ringed Parakeets Psittacula krameri and native species of conservation concern in extra-urban habitats with suggestions for a framework of PSIR indicators. Biodiversity 24(1-2): 96-101
Battisti C, Dodaro G, Franco D 2014. The data reliability in ecological research: a proposal for a quick self-assessment tool. Nat Hist Sc 1(2): 75-79
Battisti C, Amori G, Luiselli L 2020. Toward a new generation of effective problem solvers and projectoriented applied ecologists. Web Ecol 20: 11-17.
Bibby C, Burgess N, Hill D, Mustoe S 2000. Bird census techniques. Academic Press, New York.
Brandi G, Sisti M, Amagliani G 2000. Evaluation of the environmental impact of microbial aerosols generated by wastewater treatment plants utilizing different aeration systems. J Appl Microbiol 88(5): 845-852
Chen KH, Wang HC, Han JL, Liu WZ, Cheng HY, Liang B, Wang AJ 2020. The application of footprints for assessing the sustainability of wastewater treatment plants: A review. J Clean Prod 277: 124053
Del Monte M, D’Orefice M, Luberti GM, Marini R, Pica A, Vergari F 2016. Geomorphological classification of urban landscapes: the case study of Rome (Italy). J Maps 12: 178-189
Di Santo MP, Battisti C, Carpaneto GM 2021. Species-area relationships in urban ponds differ between wild and human-fed domesticated birds. Ornithol Science 20(2): 263-270
Dodaro G, Battisti C 2014. Rose-ringed parakeet (Psittacula krameri) and starling (Sturnus vulgaris) syntopics in a Mediterranean urban park: evidence for competition in nest-site selection? Belg J Zool 144(1): 5-14
Dytham C 2011. Choosing and using statistics: a biologist’s guide. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Fraquelli G, Giandrone R 2003. Reforming the wastewater treatment sector in Italy: Implications of plant size, structure, and scale economies. Water Resources Res 39(10): 1293
Frederick PC, McGehee SM 1994. Wading bird use of wastewater treatment wetlands in central Florida, USA. Colonial Waterbirds 17: 50-59
Grapow LC, Fanelli G 1993. The vanishing landscape of the Campagna Romana. Lands Urb Plan 24(1-4): 69-76
Harebottle DM, Williams AJ, Weiss Y, Tong GB 2008. Waterbirds at Paarl waste-water treatment works, South Africa, 1994-2004: seasonality, trends, and conservation importance. Ostrich 79(2): 147-163
Hill MO, Gauch HG 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis, an improved ordination technique. Vie Milieu / Life & Environment, 2024, 74 (1-2) Vegetation 42: 47-58
Hsu CB, Hsieh HL, Yang L, Wu SH, Chang JS, Hsiao SC, Su HC, Yeh CH, Ho YS, Lin HJ 2011. Biodiversity of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Ecolog Engineer 37: 1533-1545
Kärrman E 2001. Strategies towards sustainable wastewater management. Urban Water 3(1-2): 63-72
Johnson AC 2019. Is freshwater macroinvertebrate biodiversity being harmed by synthetic chemicals in municipal wastewater? Curr Opin Environm Sc Health 11: 8-12
Jost L 2010. The relation between evenness and diversity. Diversity 2(2): 207-232
Liao F, Gu W, Li D, Liang J, Fu X, Xu W, Duan R, Wang X, Jing H, DaI J 2019. Characteristics of microbial communities and intestinal pathogenic bacteria for migrated Larus ridibundus in southwest China. Microbiol Open 8(4): e00693
Literák I, Čížek A, Honza M 1992. Examinations of young Black-headed Gulls (Larus ridibundus) for the detection of Salmonellae in the environment. Acta Veterinaria Brno 61(2-3): 141-146
Keylock C 2005. Simpson diversity and the Shannon-Wiener index as special cases of a generalized entropy. Oikos 109(1): 203-207
Magurran A 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity. John Wiley & Sons, New York: 268
Magurran AE, McGill B eds 2011. Biological Diversity: Frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 345
Murray CG, Hamilton AJ 2010. Perspectives on wastewater treatment wetlands and waterbird conservation. J Appl Ecol 47(5): 976-985
Murray CG, Kasel S, Szantyr E, Barratt R, Hamilton AJ 2014. Waterbird use of different treatment stages in waste-stabilisation pond systems. Emu-Austral Ornithol 114(1): 30-40
Orłowski G 2013. Factors affecting the use of waste-stabilization ponds by birds: A case study of conservation implications of a sewage farm in Europe. Ecol Engineer 61: 436-445
Panuccio M, Foschi F, Audinet JP, Calò CM, Bologna MA 2017. Urban wetlands: wastelands or hotspots for conservation? Two case studies from Rome, Italy. Avocetta 41: 13-18
Redolfi De Zan L, Battisti C, Carpaneto GM 2011. Inter-annual and intra-seasonal patterns of abundance in a set of common waterbirds: A long-term study in a Mediterranean wetland. Vie et Milieu 61(2):101-106
Ricotta C 2005. Through the Jungle of Biological Diversity. Acta Biotheor 53: 29-38
Sixl W, Karpiskova R, Hubalek Z, Halouzka J, Mikulaskova M, Salava J 1997. Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in Black-headed Gulls (Larus ridibundus). Centr Europ J Publ Health 5(1):24-26.
Sutherland WJ ed 2006. Ecological census techniques: a handbook. Cambridge University press, New York: 432 p.
Venkatesh G, Brattebø H 2011. Environmental impact analysis of chemicals and energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants: case study of Oslo, Norway. Water Sc Technol 63(5): 1018-1031
Zacchei D, Battisti C, Carpaneto GM 2011. Contrasting effects of water stress on wetland‐obligated birds in a semi‐natural Mediterranean wetland. Lakes Reserv: Res & Manag 16(4): 281-286